Is a futures prop page the same business as the firm that clears futures?

No. This page is the trading program. It does not open a brokerage account and it does not wear the clearer's name to look established. A visitor who needs the broker is linked away, with a label that says the desk is different. Futures@ here answers program questions only.

Where does a futures drawdown question go without a fairness promise?

Risk@ points at the firm's version and can confirm which version the trader was given. The page does not summarize the threshold or call it fair, typical, or standard. Traders@ can resend the document. A leaderboard of who survived the rule is not published.

Who reads a contract and session question on this prop desk?

Risk@ if it is about the firm's own cap or an exception. Traders@ if the trader cannot find the document that defines the session. Exchange specifications are not reprinted. The page will not promise that a late fill is judged kindly, and it hosts no order ticket.

What evaluation text will a futures prop page refuse to draft?

Any summary that becomes a second rule, including a drawdown threshold and a session translation. The firm supplies the document. The studio builds the path to futures@, risk@, and traders@. It does not waive a rule in a chat window before the next open.

Home / Desks / Finance / Futures prop

A futures-prop site for the trading firm, not the clearer.

A futures trader and a clearing firm are different businesses, and this page is only the trading firm. One visitor wants a rule about a session. Another visitor is really looking for a broker. The page says it is not the broker. Futures@ can describe the program in the firm's words. Risk@ reads a drawdown question without calling the rule fair or unfair. Traders@ points at the evaluation document. No contract is bought or sold from the site.

A futures trader is not the clearing client

The first paragraph draws the line. This firm runs a trading program. It does not clear the visitor's futures account and it does not hold itself out as the broker page. A person who needs the broker is linked there, if that page exists, with a label that says it is a different company or a different desk. Futures@ on this page answers program questions. It does not open a brokerage account. Mixing the brands is how a drawdown complaint lands on the wrong desk.

Risk@ is the trading firm's risk team. A session question, such as which hours the firm's rules treat as the session, is answered by pointing at the document, not by debating fairness. Traders@ does not soften a drawdown rule because a trader had a bad open. The page will not say the rule is fair, typical, or industry standard. Those adjectives are promises about a policy the studio does not write.

This page belongs to the trading firm

Use the firm's name for itself and do not borrow the clearer's name to look established. If a relationship with a broker exists, the firm can say so in a sentence it approves, without implying the broker endorses the evaluation. Contract specifications are not reprinted here. A contract question that is really about the exchange's spec belongs off this page. A contract question that is about the firm's own maximum is a risk@ question and still does not publish the number.

Traders@ owns the where-is-the-document job. Futures@ owns the what-desk-is-this job. Risk@ owns the exception job. Write those verbs under the addresses. A trader writing at the end of a session should see whether risk@ is staffed or whether the note waits. Waiting is acceptable. A fake live chat that implies a rule can be waived before the next open is not. The site does not waive drawdown rules.

Drawdown rules are not a fairness claim

State that a drawdown rule exists only if the firm says it exists, and state that the text is the firm's. Do not summarize the threshold. A summary becomes the rule traders quote back, and it will be wrong the day the firm edits the document. Risk@ can confirm which version a trader was given. Traders@ can resend that version. Futures@ does not publish a leaderboard of who survived the rule. Leaderboards are marketing dressed as fairness.

Session boundaries are similarly unsummarized. The page may say the firm's document defines the session it uses for the rule. It may not translate that into a promise that a late fill will be judged kindly. Contract counts, if the firm caps them, stay in the same document. The public sentence is where to ask, which is risk@ for an exception and traders@ for a copy. No order ticket sits under those links.

Growth fits a futures prop firm that must stay distinct from the clearing broker and keep drawdown text in the firm's document rather than a fairness claim.

Motus does not fund a futures account or promise that a drawdown rule is fair. The site describes the firm. We do not draft its evaluation.

The package

Starter is $274, Growth is $597, and Authority is $1,197. Each price is one time. Year-1 hosting is included, then hosting is $150 a year. There is no monthly website retainer. Company email on your domain can use futures@, risk@ and traders@. A mailbox-provider seat fee and a registrar's domain fee are quoted before they start. We do not provide the licensed service.

Buy Growth — $597 Buy Starter — $274 Authority is $1,197

Send intake or see all three packages. Transportation companies still start at trucking websites.

Questions

Is a futures prop page the same business as the firm that clears futures?: No. This page is the trading program. It does not open a brokerage account and it does not wear the clearer's name to look established. A visitor who needs the broker is linked away, with a label that says the desk is different. Futures@ here answers program questions only.
Where does a futures drawdown question go without a fairness promise?: Risk@ points at the firm's version and can confirm which version the trader was given. The page does not summarize the threshold or call it fair, typical, or standard. Traders@ can resend the document. A leaderboard of who survived the rule is not published.
Who reads a contract and session question on this prop desk?: Risk@ if it is about the firm's own cap or an exception. Traders@ if the trader cannot find the document that defines the session. Exchange specifications are not reprinted. The page will not promise that a late fill is judged kindly, and it hosts no order ticket.
What evaluation text will a futures prop page refuse to draft?: Any summary that becomes a second rule, including a drawdown threshold and a session translation. The firm supplies the document. The studio builds the path to futures@, risk@, and traders@. It does not waive a rule in a chat window before the next open.

Keep reading

Motus Website is a private studio. We are not a broker-dealer, insurer, lender, real-estate licensee, or government office. We do not file a license and we never ask for a portal password. Call +1 682 978 8641 or write [email protected].